🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, delayed for at least 12 months after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for different infractions “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves growing volumes of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.